Re: [PATCH] Test for sigsetjmp support in analyzer tests requiring that feature.

2020-04-02 Thread Sandra Loosemore
On 4/2/20 4:09 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote: Interestingly, only those two testcases use the effective-target check: gcc.dg/analyzer/sigsetjmp-5.c, gcc.dg/analyzer/sigsetjmp-6.c Regarding the link test: No header file is included – it just defines the function ("extern char $funcname();") and calls

Re: [PATCH] Test for sigsetjmp support in analyzer tests requiring that feature.

2020-04-02 Thread Tobias Burnus
Interestingly, only those two testcases use the effective-target check: gcc.dg/analyzer/sigsetjmp-5.c, gcc.dg/analyzer/sigsetjmp-6.c Regarding the link test: No header file is included – it just defines the function ("extern char $funcname();") and calls it. The check fails as "sigsetjmp" does

Re: [PATCH] Test for sigsetjmp support in analyzer tests requiring that feature.

2020-04-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2020-03-22T11:31:31-0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > The new-ish analyzer test cases sigsetjmp-5.c and sigsetjmp-6.c were > failing on nios2-elf and probably other newlib targets due to lack of > support for sigsetjmp. I didn't see a suitable existing > effective-target test for this, so

Re: [PATCH] Test for sigsetjmp support in analyzer tests requiring that feature.

2020-03-22 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc-patches
On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 11:31 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote: > The new-ish analyzer test cases sigsetjmp-5.c and sigsetjmp-6.c were > failing on nios2-elf and probably other newlib targets due to lack > of > support for sigsetjmp. Sorry about the breakage. > I didn't see a suitable existing >

[PATCH] Test for sigsetjmp support in analyzer tests requiring that feature.

2020-03-22 Thread Sandra Loosemore
The new-ish analyzer test cases sigsetjmp-5.c and sigsetjmp-6.c were failing on nios2-elf and probably other newlib targets due to lack of support for sigsetjmp. I didn't see a suitable existing effective-target test for this, so I added one. OK to commit? -Sandra commit