Hi,
On Thu, Jun 13 2019, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Hi,
> i read all changes except for ipa-sra itself. Here are some comments,
> I will look at the remaining file next.
>
> Honza
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.h b/gcc/cgraph.h
> index 9a19d83fffb..3f838c08e76 100644
> --- a/gcc/cgraph.h
> +++
On 5/10/19 10:31 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Thanks in advance for any questions, comments and suggestions,
Hi.
I have just a small note that I would appreciate a dbgcnt for the future.
I bet it will be useful for a test-case reduction.
Thank you,
Martin
Hi,
i read all changes except for ipa-sra itself. Here are some comments,
I will look at the remaining file next.
Honza
diff --git a/gcc/cgraph.h b/gcc/cgraph.h
index 9a19d83fffb..3f838c08e76 100644
--- a/gcc/cgraph.h
+++ b/gcc/cgraph.h
struct GTY(()) cgraph_clone_info
{
+ /* Constants
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 4:04 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hi Richi,
>
> On Thu, May 16 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:31 AM Martin Jambor wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> this is a follow-up from a WIP patch I sent here in late December:
> >>
Hi Richi,
On Thu, May 16 2019, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:31 AM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> this is a follow-up from a WIP patch I sent here in late December:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01765.html
>>
>> Just like the last time, the patch
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 10:31 AM Martin Jambor wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> this is a follow-up from a WIP patch I sent here in late December:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01765.html
>
> Just like the last time, the patch below is is a reimplementation of
> IPA-SRA to make it a full
Hello,
this is a follow-up from a WIP patch I sent here in late December:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-12/msg01765.html
Just like the last time, the patch below is is a reimplementation of
IPA-SRA to make it a full IPA pass that can handle strictly connected
components in the
