Re: [PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-26 Thread Eric Botcazou
While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc. In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them. Also, these were matching 'reg' objects

Re: [PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-26 Thread David Miller
From: Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:40:08 +0200 While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc. In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we would not get a true return

Re: [PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-26 Thread Eric Botcazou
Thanks for catching this. Also the comment at the top can now mention the now-available constraint letter as well. Ah, yes. And doc/md.texi be adjusted accordingly. -- Eric Botcazou

[PATCH] Use define_memory_constraint on sparc when necessary.

2012-10-23 Thread David Miller
While playing around with LRA on sparc I noticed that we had some poorly formed target memory constraints on sparc. In particular, they were not using define_memory_constraint, so we would not get a true return from EXTRA_MEMORY_CONSTRAINT for them. Also, these were matching 'reg' objects for