Hi!
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 01:59:07AM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> +;; Return true if the operand is a PC-relative address to a local symbol or a
> +;; label that can be used directly in a memory operation.
"address of", not "address to"?
> +/* Different PowerPC instruction formats that
This patch replaces patch #1. It tries to address most/all of the review
comments.
This patch bootstraps fine, and there are no regressions. When I applied this
patch, the revised patch #2 that will be posted next and the other patches, it
builds Spec 2017 with -mcpu=future. The other patches
