Hi Juzhe,
> Hi, Kewen.
>
> You mean COND_LEN_* family I added is unlikely used by power in the future?
Since AFAIK there is no plan to extend len family on Power, it's very likely
that
Power will have no chance to leverage them, so yes.
> Could you revise them to make it possible used by
it with dummy mask = { -1, -1, ..., -1}.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Kewen.Lin
Date: 2023-07-11 09:17
To: Richard Biener
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford; linkw; krebbel; Ju-Zhe Zhong; Segher
Boessenkool; David Edelsohn; Peter Bergner
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Add COND_LEN_* operations for loop
on 2023/7/10 18:40, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
>
>> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>>
>> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>>
>> This patch is adding cond_len_* operations pattern for target support
>> loop control with length.
>
> It looks mostly OK - the probably
COND_LEN_* operations for loop control with
length targets
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch is adding cond_len_* operations pattern for target support
> loop control with length.
It looks mostly OK - t
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023, juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai wrote:
> From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
>
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
>
> This patch is adding cond_len_* operations pattern for target support
> loop control with length.
It looks mostly OK - the probably obvious question is with rearding
to the "missing" bias
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
Hi, Richard and Richi.
This patch is adding cond_len_* operations pattern for target support loop
control with length.
These patterns will be used in these following case:
1. Integer division:
void
f (int32_t *restrict a, int32_t *restrict b, int32_t *restrict c, int
