On 11/01/13 12:02, Greta Yorsh wrote:
> Tom, are you going to apply this patch?
Greta,
While testing I've ran into several issues with timeouts (not related to this
patch) that I needed to address, so it took me a bit, but I started the latest
build & test run yesterday evening so I expect to ch
-
> From: Tom de Vries [mailto:tom_devr...@mentor.com]
> Sent: 09 January 2013 10:11
> To: Richard Biener
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] Yet another non-prototype builtin issue (PR middle-
> end/55890)
>
> Richard,
>
> I've build r
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 11:11:13AM +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
> OK for trunk after I've tested this on mips64?
Yes, thanks.
> 2013-01-09 Tom de Vries
>
> PR middle-end/55890
> * calls.c (expand_call): Check if arg_nr is valid.
>
> Index: gcc/calls.c
>
Richard,
I've build r195008 for target mips64-linux-gnu with low optimization level
({CFLAGS,CXXFLAGS,BOOT_CFLAGS}='-g -O0'), and noticed failures for
gcc.dg/torture/pr55890-{1,2,3}.c at -O0 and -O1 (which are not there without the
low optimization level).
The -O1 pr55890-1.c failure looks like t
