On 05/19/2014 05:15 AM, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
> On 1 April 2014 23:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Comments? If approved, should this go in for 4.9, or wait for stage1?
>> Certainly it's self-contained...
>
>
> Hi, I think this should go in, with the cache line increased to 128 as
> discussed
On 1 April 2014 23:24, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Comments? If approved, should this go in for 4.9, or wait for stage1?
> Certainly it's self-contained...
Hi, I think this should go in, with the cache line increased to 128 as
discussed with Andrew.
/Marcus
> On Apr 2, 2014, at 7:37 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 04/01/2014 03:41 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> Comments? If approved, should this go in for 4.9, or wait for stage1?
>>> Certainly it's self-contained...
>>
>> On Cavium
On 04/01/2014 03:41 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Comments? If approved, should this go in for 4.9, or wait for stage1?
>> Certainly it's self-contained...
>
> On Cavium's thunder processor the cache line size is going to be
> bigger than
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Comments? If approved, should this go in for 4.9, or wait for stage1?
> Certainly it's self-contained...
On Cavium's thunder processor the cache line size is going to be
bigger than 64 bytes, what is your solution to improve performance
Comments? If approved, should this go in for 4.9, or wait for stage1?
Certainly it's self-contained...
r~
* configure.tgt: Handle aarch64 as target.
* config/aarch64/sjlj.S: New file.
* config/aarch64/target.h: New file.
diff --git a/libitm/config/aarch64/sjlj.S b/libit
