On 10/04/2016 10:25 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Sounds good. Attached is an updated patch reflecting these changes.
Restested by building the powerpc64-linux and tic6x-uclinux cross
toolchains. (Sharing the Glibc and uClibc implementation of the
target hook and defining it in targhooks.c also
On 10/04/2016 08:54 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/04/2016 04:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I copied the conditional from config/linux.h but I admit I don't
fully understand when the macro is defined.
AFAICT it's done in config.gcc, for a limited set of targets.
Should I still remove it from
On 10/04/2016 04:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I copied the conditional from config/linux.h but I admit I don't
fully understand when the macro is defined.
AFAICT it's done in config.gcc, for a limited set of targets.
Should I still remove it from targhooks.c?
That is compiled for all
On 10/04/2016 02:42 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/03/2016 12:02 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I couldn't find a good uclibc-only file where to put the new
definition of the hook so I conditionally added it to
targethooks.c.
diff --git a/gcc/targhooks.c b/gcc/targhooks.c
index d75650f..77b4a18
On 10/03/2016 12:02 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
I couldn't find a good uclibc-only file where to put the new
definition of the hook so I conditionally added it to
targethooks.c.
diff --git a/gcc/targhooks.c b/gcc/targhooks.c
index d75650f..77b4a18 100644
--- a/gcc/targhooks.c
+++
The attached patch adds a uclibc_printf_pointer_format target
hook equivalent to the linux glibc_printf_pointer_format hook.
I couldn't find a good uclibc-only file where to put the new
definition of the hook so I conditionally added it to
targethooks.c.
I tested the new hook by bootstrapping
