On Thu, 8 Oct 2020, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Richard!
>
> On 2020-10-08T13:34:02+0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > It might be interesting to work on adding sth like
> > dg-warning to look for -fopt-info-{optimized,missing} so
> > we could directly annotate (not) vectorized loops instead of
> >
Hi Richard!
On 2020-10-08T13:34:02+0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> It might be interesting to work on adding sth like
> dg-warning to look for -fopt-info-{optimized,missing} so
> we could directly annotate (not) vectorized loops instead of
> relying on fragile counts.
I'm maybe (likely?) misunders
This adjusts BB vectorization testcases to look for the number of
SLP subgraphs vectorized rather than for the number of basic blocks
we've found opportunities in because followup patches will play
with the granularity we work on, vectorizing multiple basic blocks
at a time.
Together with this, be
