On 3/1/24 14:34, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/24 13:28, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/24 12:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/1/24 13:28, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 3/1/24 12:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > >
>
On 3/1/24 13:28, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/24 12:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/1/24 12:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > >
> >
On 3/1/24 12:08, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu,
On 3/1/24 11:45, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
This was nearly enough to make things work, except we now ran into
issues with the local TYPE/CONST_DECL copies when streaming the
constexpr version of a function body. It occurred to me that we don't
need to make
gt;
> gcc/cp/module.cc
> @@ -7859,16 +7859,6 @@ trees_out::decl_value (tree decl, depset *dep)
>tree_node (get_constraints (decl));
> }
>
> ! if (streaming_p ())
> !{
> ! /* Do not stray outside this section. */
> ! gcc_checking_assert (!dep |
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/1/24 10:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >
> > > On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > > > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
> > > > OK for trunk?
> > > >
> > > > -- >8 --
On 3/1/24 10:32, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
For local enums defined in a non-template
On 3/1/24 10:00, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
For local enums defined in a non-template function or a function template
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
> > Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
> > OK for trunk?
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > For local enums defined in a non-template function or a function template
> > instantiation it seems
On 2/29/24 15:56, Patrick Palka wrote:
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
For local enums defined in a non-template function or a function template
instantiation it seems we neglect to make the function depend on the enum
definition, which
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
For local enums defined in a non-template function or a function template
instantiation it seems we neglect to make the function depend on the enum
definition, which ultimately causes streaming to fail due
14 matches
Mail list logo
