On 4/6/22 11:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:18:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
Why not check at the beginning of the function?
You just pinged this patch, but I haven't seen a response to this question.
I thought the
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:18:32AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > Why not check at the beginning of the function?
>
> You just pinged this patch, but I haven't seen a response to this question.
I thought the
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/592368.html
is the response to
On 3/25/22 14:08, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 3/25/22 12:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
cplus_decl_attributes can be called with attributes equal to
error_mark_node, there are some spots in the function that test
it or decl_attributes it calls starts with:
if (TREE_TYPE (*node) == error_mark_node
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:55:56PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:48:33PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > We then wouldn't propagate TREE_DEPRECATED/TREE_UNAVAILABLE from templates
> > to their instantiations and wouldn't diagnose static data members in
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 07:48:33PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> We then wouldn't propagate TREE_DEPRECATED/TREE_UNAVAILABLE from templates
> to their instantiations and wouldn't diagnose static data members in OpenMP
> declare target.
> But perhaps that is fine, with error_mark_attribute it is
On 3/25/22 12:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
cplus_decl_attributes can be called with attributes equal to
error_mark_node, there are some spots in the function that test
it or decl_attributes it calls starts with:
if (TREE_TYPE (*node) == error_mark_node || attributes == error_mark_node)
Hi!
cplus_decl_attributes can be called with attributes equal to
error_mark_node, there are some spots in the function that test
it or decl_attributes it calls starts with:
if (TREE_TYPE (*node) == error_mark_node || attributes == error_mark_node)
return NULL_TREE;
But the recent PR104245
