On 10/20/23 17:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:12:48PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/24/23 09:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The following patch implements C++26 unevaluated-string.
As it seems to me just extra pedanticity, it is implemented only for
-std=c++26 or -std=gnu++26
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:12:48PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 8/24/23 09:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > The following patch implements C++26 unevaluated-string.
> > As it seems to me just extra pedanticity, it is implemented only for
> > -std=c++26 or -std=gnu++26 and later and only if
On 8/24/23 09:58, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
The following patch implements C++26 unevaluated-string.
As it seems to me just extra pedanticity, it is implemented only for
-std=c++26 or -std=gnu++26 and later and only if -pedantic/-pedantic-errors.
Hmm, I assumed it was accepted as a DR, but
Hi!
The following patch implements C++26 unevaluated-string.
As it seems to me just extra pedanticity, it is implemented only for
-std=c++26 or -std=gnu++26 and later and only if -pedantic/-pedantic-errors.
Nothing is done for inline asm, while the spec changes those, it changes it
to a balanced
