On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 8:11 AM Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > > We have a few pre-existing tests that verify that the attribute is
> > > honored,
> > > such as those added by commit 1d561e1851c4. Do they actually not fail with
> > > this patch?
> >
> > T
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > We have a few pre-existing tests that verify that the attribute is honored,
> > such as those added by commit 1d561e1851c4. Do they actually not fail with
> > this patch?
>
> There are no regressions.
Sorry, I don't see how that would be possible, that's
On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 6:58 AM Alexander Monakov wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > According to the TLS spec, linker can optimize the TLS access by
> > overriding the TLS access model. Do the same in compiler by using
> > the default TLS mode if it is more optimized than the
On Wed, 30 Jul 2025, H.J. Lu wrote:
> According to the TLS spec, linker can optimize the TLS access by
> overriding the TLS access model. Do the same in compiler by using
> the default TLS mode if it is more optimized than the TLS model
> attribute.
>
> gcc/
>
> PR c/121318
> * do
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 8:24 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 5:33 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > According to the TLS spec, linker can optimize the TLS access by
> > overriding the TLS access model. Do the same in compiler by using
> > the default TLS mode if it is more optimized
On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 5:33 PM H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> According to the TLS spec, linker can optimize the TLS access by
> overriding the TLS access model. Do the same in compiler by using
> the default TLS mode if it is more optimized than the TLS model
> attribute.
So reading the old bug reports sp
According to the TLS spec, linker can optimize the TLS access by
overriding the TLS access model. Do the same in compiler by using
the default TLS mode if it is more optimized than the TLS model
attribute.
gcc/
PR c/121318
* doc/extend.texi: Update the tls_model attribute.
gcc/c
