> Hi,
>
> In the attached testcase, IPA-SRA thinks that an ifunc resolver
> (meanwhile IPA-split into two functions) function can be changed and so
> goes ahead. The cgraph machinery then however throws away the new clone
> of the caller instead of the "old" caller and inliner inlines the clone
>
Hi,
In the attached testcase, IPA-SRA thinks that an ifunc resolver
(meanwhile IPA-split into two functions) function can be changed and so
goes ahead. The cgraph machinery then however throws away the new clone
of the caller instead of the "old" caller and inliner inlines the clone
of the ".part