Hi Tobias,
This patch fixes the issue that I was seeing, thanks.
I will also now try your updated patch from
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/552330.html
Kind Regards
Vasee
On 20/08/2020, 17:29, "Tobias Burnus" wrote:
Hi,
how about my (unreviewed) patch for PR
On 20/08/2020 18:07, Vaseeharan Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> Hi Szabolcs,
>
> In the top level gcc config.log, I see:
>
> configure:5541: checking whether aarch64-none-linux-gnu-g++ supports C++11
> features by default
> configure:5837: aarch64-none-linux-gnu-g++ -c -g -O2 conftest.cpp >&5
>
Hi Szabolcs,
In the top level gcc config.log, I see:
configure:5541: checking whether aarch64-none-linux-gnu-g++ supports C++11
features by default
configure:5837: aarch64-none-linux-gnu-g++ -c -g -O2 conftest.cpp >&5
configure:5837: $? = 0
configure:5844: result: yes
configure:6542: checking
Hi,
how about my (unreviewed) patch for PR 96612 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-August/551900.html ?
That one also tries to solve the CXX_FOR_BUILD issue with an older GCC.
Would that solve your issue as well?
Tobias
On 8/20/20 4:19 PM, Ilya Leoshkevich via Gcc-patches
The 08/20/2020 13:59, Vasee Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> +# Also require C++11 for building code generation tools.
> +# Do nothing if "${build}" = "${host}", because in this case
> +# CXX_FOR_BUILD="\$(CXX)", and $CXX is already set to the correct value
> above.
> +if test "${build}" != "${host}";
On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 13:59 +0100, Vasee Vinayagamoorthy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After commit [1] ("Redefine NULL to nullptr"), building gcc
> fails when $CXX_FOR_BUILD is not using C++11 mode by default.
> This happens with gcc-4.8 which is still supported.
>
> This patch fixes this by adding
Hello,
After commit [1] ("Redefine NULL to nullptr"), building gcc
fails when $CXX_FOR_BUILD is not using C++11 mode by default.
This happens with gcc-4.8 which is still supported.
This patch fixes this by adding -std=c++11 or its equivalent
to $CXX_FOR_BUILD using AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX(11).
