On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 17:40, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:54 AM Mikael Morin wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Le 08/03/2022 à 18:58, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches a écrit :
> > > Replace \([0-9]\+\) with \([0-9][0-9]*\) or with \([1-9][0-9]*\) in
> > > release branch
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:54 AM Mikael Morin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Le 08/03/2022 à 18:58, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches a écrit :
> > Replace \([0-9]\+\) with \([0-9][0-9]*\) or with \([1-9][0-9]*\) in release
> > branch numbers, where
> > a leading zero does not occur.
> >
> Note that you also
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 14:01, Mikael Morin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Le 08/03/2022 à 18:58, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches a écrit :
> > Replace \([0-9]\+\) with \([0-9][0-9]*\) or with \([1-9][0-9]*\) in release
> > branch numbers, where
> > a leading zero does not occur.
> >
> Note that you also
Hello,
Le 08/03/2022 à 18:58, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches a écrit :
Replace \([0-9]\+\) with \([0-9][0-9]*\) or with \([1-9][0-9]*\) in release
branch numbers, where
a leading zero does not occur.
Note that you also changed some gcc-[0-9]* to gcc-[1-9]*, which is a
typo/thinko I guess?
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 05:58:34PM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> This now works with Solaris /usr/xpg4/bin/sed and should work with BSD
> sed too.
>
> OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> POSIX sed does not support \? or \+ in its Basic Regular Expression
> grammar. Replace the
This now works with Solaris /usr/xpg4/bin/sed and should work with BSD
sed too.
OK for trunk?
-- >8 --
POSIX sed does not support \? or \+ in its Basic Regular Expression
grammar. Replace the \(tags/\)\? part of the pattern with a substitution
to remove ^tags/ before other substitutions.
