On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
>>> that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
>>> types with differen
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:51 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2018 09:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:41 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2018
On 08/27/2018 09:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:41 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced V
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:27 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
> >>> that was traced back
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:41 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
> >>> that was traced
On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
>>> that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
>>> types with differen
On 08/27/2018 02:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
types with different sign by expan
On 08/27/2018 10:32 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
>>> that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
>>> types with differen
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 9:14 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
> > that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
> > types with different sign by expand_builtin_strncmp().
> >
> > The at
On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 12:13 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
>> that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
>> types with different sign by expand_builtin_strncmp().
>>
>> The attache
On 08/24/2018 01:06 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
> that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
> types with different sign by expand_builtin_strncmp().
>
> The attached patch adjusts the function to make sure both
> operands
PR 87059 points out an ICE in the recently enhanced VRP code
that was traced back to a MIN_EXPR built out of operands of
types with different sign by expand_builtin_strncmp().
The attached patch adjusts the function to make sure both
operands have the same type, and to make these mismatches
easie
12 matches
Mail list logo