Jan Hubicka writes:
>> On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 10:04 -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
>> > On 2/3/20 2:17 AM, Jiufu Guo wrote:
>> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 937042044" 1
>> > > "loop2_unroll"} } */
>> >
>> > Sorry I didn't catch this addition to the original testcase
>> >
> On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 10:04 -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
> > On 2/3/20 2:17 AM, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> > > +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 937042044" 1
> > > "loop2_unroll"} } */
> >
> > Sorry I didn't catch this addition to the original testcase earlier, but I
> > wonder how stable
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 10:04 -0600, Pat Haugen wrote:
> On 2/3/20 2:17 AM, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 937042044" 1
> > "loop2_unroll"} } */
>
> Sorry I didn't catch this addition to the original testcase earlier, but I
> wonder how stable this test is
On 2/3/20 2:17 AM, Jiufu Guo wrote:
> +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump-times "REG_BR_PROB 937042044" 1
> "loop2_unroll"} } */
Sorry I didn't catch this addition to the original testcase earlier, but I
wonder how stable this test is going to be. If there are future changes to
default
Hi,
PR68212 mentioned that the COUNT of unrolled loop was not correct, and
comments of this PR also mentioned that loop become 'cold'. The patches
of the PR fixed part of the issue. With reference the patch
(https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-11/msg02368.html) and comment
