Hi Iain,
> Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 7, 2022 2:40 pm:
>> Hi Iain,
>>
Yes, this is data related. The DSO registry picks up nothing in the
miscompiled stage2 compiler, leaving all data uninitialized. The stage1
compiler works, and runs all module constructors
Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 7, 2022 2:40 pm:
> Hi Iain,
>
>>> Yes, this is data related. The DSO registry picks up nothing in the
>>> miscompiled stage2 compiler, leaving all data uninitialized. The stage1
>>> compiler works, and runs all module constructors ahead of
Hi Iain,
>> Yes, this is data related. The DSO registry picks up nothing in the
>> miscompiled stage2 compiler, leaving all data uninitialized. The stage1
>> compiler works, and runs all module constructors ahead of compilation.
>>
>
> Ohh, backtrack on that, analysis is correct, but it is a
Excerpts from Iain Buclaw's message of September 6, 2022 11:41 pm:
> Excerpts from Iain Buclaw's message of September 6, 2022 7:02 pm:
>> Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 6, 2022 4:25 pm:
>>> Hi Iain,
>>>
> there is indeed ;-) The previous d21 emits
>
> binary
Excerpts from Iain Buclaw's message of September 6, 2022 7:02 pm:
> Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 6, 2022 4:25 pm:
>> Hi Iain,
>>
there is indeed ;-) The previous d21 emits
binary./266566/gcc/d21
version v2.100.1
predefs GNU D_Version2
Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 6, 2022 4:25 pm:
> Hi Iain,
>
>>> there is indeed ;-) The previous d21 emits
>>>
>>> binary./266566/gcc/d21
>>> version v2.100.1
>>>
>>> predefs GNU D_Version2 LittleEndian GNU_DWARF2_Exceptions
>>> GNU_StackGrowsDown GNU_InlineAsm assert
Hi Iain,
>> there is indeed ;-) The previous d21 emits
>>
>> binary./266566/gcc/d21
>> version v2.100.1
>>
>> predefs GNU D_Version2 LittleEndian GNU_DWARF2_Exceptions
>> GNU_StackGrowsDown GNU_InlineAsm assert D_PreConditions D_PostConditions
>> D_Invariants D_ModuleInfo D_Exceptions
Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 6, 2022 2:04 pm:
> Hi Iain,
>
>> Is there a difference in output from `./gcc/d21 -quiet -v` ?
>>
>> Pay attention to any predefs that have suddenly appeared or disappeared.
>
> there is indeed ;-) The previous d21 emits
>
> binary
Hi Iain,
> Is there a difference in output from `./gcc/d21 -quiet -v` ?
>
> Pay attention to any predefs that have suddenly appeared or disappeared.
there is indeed ;-) The previous d21 emits
binary./266566/gcc/d21
version v2.100.1
predefs GNU D_Version2 LittleEndian
Excerpts from Rainer Orth's message of September 6, 2022 9:42 am:
> Hi Iain,
>
>> Excerpts from Richard Biener's message of September 1, 2022 8:28 am:
>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:21 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>> Ah yes - I think, even if a bit verbose, this is exactly how it was supposed
>>>
Hi Iain,
> Excerpts from Richard Biener's message of September 1, 2022 8:28 am:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:21 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 31, 2022 7:16 pm:
>>> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Excerpts from
Excerpts from Richard Biener's message of September 1, 2022 8:28 am:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:21 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 31, 2022 7:16 pm:
>> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >
>> >> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 9:21 PM Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 31, 2022 7:16 pm:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> >> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 30, 2022 11:53 pm:
> >> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Richard Biener
Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 31, 2022 7:16 pm:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 30, 2022 11:53 pm:
>> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> >
>> >> I was hoping Joseph would
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 30, 2022 11:53 pm:
> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> >> I was hoping Joseph would chime in here - I recollect debugging this kind
> >> of thing and a thread
Excerpts from Joseph Myers's message of August 30, 2022 11:53 pm:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> I was hoping Joseph would chime in here - I recollect debugging this kind
>> of thing and a thread about this a while back but unfortunately I do not
>> remember the
On Fri, 26 Aug 2022, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> I was hoping Joseph would chime in here - I recollect debugging this kind
> of thing and a thread about this a while back but unfortunately I do not
> remember the details here (IIRC some things get included where they
> better should
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:17 PM Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Because targetdm contains hooks pertaining to both the target platform
> and cpu, it tries to pull in both platform and cpu headers via tm_d.h in
> the source file where TARGETDM_INITIALIZER is used.
>
> Since 12.0,
Hi,
Because targetdm contains hooks pertaining to both the target platform
and cpu, it tries to pull in both platform and cpu headers via tm_d.h in
the source file where TARGETDM_INITIALIZER is used.
Since 12.0, this has caused problems when there is no platform (*-elf),
resulting in
19 matches
Mail list logo
