On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 9:52 AM Christophe Lyon <
christophe.lyon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 4:07 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> On 7/30/21 9:06 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> > On 7/27/21 2:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>> >> Ping:
On Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 4:07 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> On 7/30/21 9:06 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 7/27/21 2:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575690.html
> >>
> >> Are there any other suggestions
On 7/30/21 9:06 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/27/21 2:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575690.html
Are there any other suggestions or comments or is the latest revision
okay to commit?
OK.
I had to make a few more adjustments to fix up
On 7/27/21 2:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575690.html
Are there any other suggestions or comments or is the latest revision
okay to commit?
OK.
On 7/20/21 12:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575690.html
Are there any other suggestions or comments or is the latest revision
okay to commit?
On 7/20/21 12:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21
On 7/20/21 2:08 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/20/21 2:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 9:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On
On 7/20/21 2:34 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 9:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:23 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/14/21 10:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 9:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard
On 7/14/21 10:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 9:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Somebody with more C++
On 7/13/21 9:39 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Somebody with more C++ knowledge than me needs to approve the
vec.h
On 7/12/21 5:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/7/21 1:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:06 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573968.html
Any questions/suggestions on the
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 04:39, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> Somebody with more C++ knowledge than me
On 7/13/21 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Somebody with more C++ knowledge than me needs to approve the
vec.h changes - I don't feel competent to assess all
On 7/13/21 12:37 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Somebody with more C++ knowledge than me needs to approve the
vec.h changes - I don't feel competent to assess all effects of the
change.
They look OK to
On 7/13/21 10:08 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
Somebody with more C++ knowledge than me needs to approve the
vec.h changes - I don't feel competent to assess all effects of the change.
They look OK to me except for:
-extern vnull vNULL;
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 at 12:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> Somebody with more C++ knowledge than me needs to approve the
> vec.h changes - I don't feel competent to assess all effects of the change.
They look OK to me except for:
-extern vnull vNULL;
+static constexpr vnull vNULL{ };
Making vNULL
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 4:37 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 7/7/21 1:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:06 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573968.html
> >>
> >> Any questions/suggestions on the final patch or is it
On 7/7/21 1:28 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:06 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573968.html
Any questions/suggestions on the final patch or is it okay to commit?
I don't remember seeing one (aka saying
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 5:06 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573968.html
>
> Any questions/suggestions on the final patch or is it okay to commit?
I don't remember seeing one (aka saying "bootstrapped/tested, OK to commit?"
or so) - and the
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573968.html
Any questions/suggestions on the final patch or is it okay to commit?
On 6/29/21 7:46 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 11:00 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> > Note there's also array_slice<> which could be used to pass non-const
> > vec<>s that are never resized but modified - the only "valid" case of
> > passing a non-const vec<> by value.
>
>
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 30 2021, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:46 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>> On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
[...]
>> >
>> > But I wonder if since you now identified them they could be massaged
>> > prior to doing the change.
>> >
>> > I do hope we end up
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> Note there's also array_slice<> which could be used to pass non-const
> vec<>s that are never resized but modified - the only "valid" case of
> passing a non-const vec<> by value.
Yeah. We'd need a new constructor for that (the current one only
takes
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:46 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 4:11
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 7:18 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/29/21 8:43 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/28/21 2:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill
On 6/29/21 4:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38
On 6/29/21 8:43 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill
On 6/28/21 2:07 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 02:51:58PM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > > On 4/27/21
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 29 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
>>
>> vNULL can bind to a const vec& (via the vec conversion ctor) but
>> not to vec&. The three functions that in the patch are passed
>> vNULL modify the argument when
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:07 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
> >>
> >> On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill
On 6/28/21 2:07 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 12:36 AM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 10:52 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> >> On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>> On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:11 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard
On 6/25/21 4:51 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM
On 6/1/21 3:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 5:26 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> > On 6/7/21 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/7/21 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM,
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 04:17:09PM -0600, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 6/3/21 2:29 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor
On 6/3/21 2:29 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor
On 6/7/21 2:51 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 12:33 PM Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 10:51:18AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > >
On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 10:51:18AM +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> > > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Trevor Saunders wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:04:03AM -0600, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
> > >
> > > On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
On 6/2/21 12:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 9:56 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >> On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 4/27/21 1:58 AM,
On 6/1/21 3:56 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27,
On 5/27/21 2:53 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via
On 4/27/21 11:52 AM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
PR 90904 notes that
Jason, I wonder if you could review this patch that Richard has
apparently decided to defer to others.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568901.html
Thanks
On 5/11/21 2:02 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping 2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568901.html
On
Ping 2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568901.html
On 5/3/21 3:50 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568901.html
On 4/27/21 9:52 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568901.html
On 4/27/21 9:52 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin
On 4/27/21 8:04 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
the class manages
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:59 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
> >> the class manages its own memory but
On 4/27/21 1:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
the class manages its own memory but doesn't define (or delete)
either special function. Since I first ran into the
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 2:46 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
> the class manages its own memory but doesn't define (or delete)
> either special function. Since I first ran into the problem,
> auto_vec has grown a move
PR 90904 notes that auto_vec is unsafe to copy and assign because
the class manages its own memory but doesn't define (or delete)
either special function. Since I first ran into the problem,
auto_vec has grown a move ctor and move assignment from
a dynamically-allocated vec but still no copy
59 matches
Mail list logo
