On 11/24/20 2:53 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ping.
>
>
> Grüße
> Thomas
>
>
> On 2020-11-06T10:26:46+0100, I wrote:
>> Hi, again!
>>
>> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
>>> of dump message,
Hi!
Ping.
Grüße
Thomas
On 2020-11-06T10:26:46+0100, I wrote:
> Hi, again!
>
> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
>> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between
>>
Hi!
On 2020-11-13T15:06:45-0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/6/20 1:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> The patch adds "dg-optimized" and "dg-missed" directives
>> These currently print "(test for *errors*, line [...])". However, these
>>
Hi!
On 2020-11-13T15:06:24-0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/6/20 1:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH] [testsuite] Enable column location checking for
>> 'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed'
> OK
Thanks, pushed "[testsuite] Enable column location checking for
'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed'" to
On 11/6/20 1:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
>> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between
>> MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE
On 11/6/20 1:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> The patch adds "dg-optimized" and "dg-missed" directives
> Another small thing I just noticed:
>
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp
>> +# Handle
Hi, again!
On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between
> MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the
> textual
Hi!
On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> The patch adds "dg-optimized" and "dg-missed" directives
Another small thing I just noticed:
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp
> +# Handle output from -fopt-info for MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS:
> +# a
Hi!
On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between
> MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the
> textual output.
>
Rainer Orth writes:
> Hi Andreas,
>
>> On Okt 01 2018, David Malcolm wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a link to the .log files somewhere so I can see the precise
>>> messages in question? (e.g. are they all "loop versioned for
>>> vectorization to enhance alignment"?).
>>
>> Yes, they are all the same
Hi Andreas,
> On Okt 01 2018, David Malcolm wrote:
>
>> Is there a link to the .log files somewhere so I can see the precise
>> messages in question? (e.g. are they all "loop versioned for
>> vectorization to enhance alignment"?).
>
> Yes, they are all the same message.
just for the record:
On Okt 01 2018, David Malcolm wrote:
> Is there a link to the .log files somewhere so I can see the precise
> messages in question? (e.g. are they all "loop versioned for
> vectorization to enhance alignment"?).
Yes, they are all the same message.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab,
On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 00:12 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> That produces extra output that breaks a few tests.
>
> g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
> g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
> g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++98
That produces extra output that breaks a few tests.
g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++11 (test for excess errors)
g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)
g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++98 (test for excess errors)
g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-3.cc (test
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:12 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between
> MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the
> textual output.
>
As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds
of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between
MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the
textual output.
This patch changes dumpfile.c so that the "note: " varies to show
16 matches
Mail list logo