Re: Add 'dg-note' next to 'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed' (was: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION})

2020-11-30 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/24/20 2:53 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > Ping. > > > Grüße > Thomas > > > On 2020-11-06T10:26:46+0100, I wrote: >> Hi, again! >> >> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: >>> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds >>> of dump message,

Re: Add 'dg-note' next to 'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed' (was: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION})

2020-11-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Ping. Grüße Thomas On 2020-11-06T10:26:46+0100, I wrote: > Hi, again! > > On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: >> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds >> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between >>

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2020-11-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2020-11-13T15:06:45-0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/6/20 1:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: >>> The patch adds "dg-optimized" and "dg-missed" directives >> These currently print "(test for *errors*, line [...])". However, these >>

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2020-11-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2020-11-13T15:06:24-0700, Jeff Law wrote: > On 11/6/20 1:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] [testsuite] Enable column location checking for >> 'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed' > OK Thanks, pushed "[testsuite] Enable column location checking for 'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed'" to

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2020-11-13 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/6/20 1:38 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: >> As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds >> of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between >> MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2020-11-13 Thread Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 11/6/20 1:50 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: >> The patch adds "dg-optimized" and "dg-missed" directives > Another small thing I just noticed: > >> --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp >> +# Handle

Add 'dg-note' next to 'dg-optimized', 'dg-missed' (was: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION})

2020-11-06 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi, again! On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: > As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds > of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between > MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the > textual

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2020-11-06 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: > The patch adds "dg-optimized" and "dg-missed" directives Another small thing I just noticed: > --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/gcc-dg.exp > +# Handle output from -fopt-info for MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS: > +# a

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2020-11-06 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2018-09-25T16:00:14-0400, David Malcolm wrote: > As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds > of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between > MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the > textual output. >

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-12-05 Thread Rainer Orth
Rainer Orth writes: > Hi Andreas, > >> On Okt 01 2018, David Malcolm wrote: >> >>> Is there a link to the .log files somewhere so I can see the precise >>> messages in question? (e.g. are they all "loop versioned for >>> vectorization to enhance alignment"?). >> >> Yes, they are all the same

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-10-04 Thread Rainer Orth
Hi Andreas, > On Okt 01 2018, David Malcolm wrote: > >> Is there a link to the .log files somewhere so I can see the precise >> messages in question? (e.g. are they all "loop versioned for >> vectorization to enhance alignment"?). > > Yes, they are all the same message. just for the record:

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-10-01 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 01 2018, David Malcolm wrote: > Is there a link to the .log files somewhere so I can see the precise > messages in question? (e.g. are they all "loop versioned for > vectorization to enhance alignment"?). Yes, they are all the same message. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab,

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-10-01 Thread David Malcolm
On Sun, 2018-09-30 at 00:12 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > That produces extra output that breaks a few tests. > > g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) > g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) > g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++98

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-09-29 Thread Andreas Schwab
That produces extra output that breaks a few tests. g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++11 (test for excess errors) g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++14 (test for excess errors) g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-2.cc -std=c++98 (test for excess errors) g++.dg/vect/pr33426-ivdep-3.cc (test

Re: [PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-09-28 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:12 PM David Malcolm wrote: > > As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds > of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between > MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the > textual output. >

[PATCH] dumpfile.c: use prefixes other that 'note: ' for MSG_{OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS|MISSED_OPTIMIZATION}

2018-09-25 Thread David Malcolm
As noted at Cauldron, dumpfile.c currently emits "note: " for all kinds of dump message, so that (after filtering) there's no distinction between MSG_OPTIMIZED_LOCATIONS vs MSG_NOTE vs MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION in the textual output. This patch changes dumpfile.c so that the "note: " varies to show