On 07/19/2017 10:10 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 07/19/2017 12:42 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
>>> than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and
>>> related functions.
Ping: Jeff, please see my reply below.
On 07/19/2017 10:10 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 07/19/2017 12:42 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by
On 07/19/2017 12:42 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and
related functions.
The meat of the patch is relatively simple but because it
On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
> than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and
> related functions.
>
> The meat of the patch is relatively simple but because it introduces
> dependencies between
Ping #2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00036.html
On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and
related functions.
The meat of the patch is
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00036.html
On 07/02/2017 02:00 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and
related functions.
The meat of the patch is
The attached patch enhances the -Wrestrict warning to detect more
than just trivial instances of overlapping copying by sprintf and
related functions.
The meat of the patch is relatively simple but because it introduces
dependencies between existing classes in the sprintf pass I had to
move the
