Re: [PATCH] expand description of poly_int conversions

On 02/26/2018 02:09 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Martin Sebor writes: >> On 02/26/2018 12:45 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> Martin Sebor writes: Richard, If you agree, I'd like to update the conversion section of the poly_int manual to

Re: [PATCH] expand description of poly_int conversions

Martin Sebor writes: > On 02/26/2018 12:45 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> Martin Sebor writes: >>> Richard, >>> >>> If you agree, I'd like to update the conversion section of >>> the poly_int manual to make the conversion to make it clearer >>> that the

Re: [PATCH] expand description of poly_int conversions

On 02/26/2018 12:45 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: Martin Sebor writes: Richard, If you agree, I'd like to update the conversion section of the poly_int manual to make the conversion to make it clearer that the to_constant() function can be used even with class types like

Re: [PATCH] expand description of poly_int conversions

Martin Sebor writes: > Richard, > > If you agree, I'd like to update the conversion section of > the poly_int manual to make the conversion to make it clearer > that the to_constant() function can be used even with class > types like offset_int besides scalars. > > Also, when

[PATCH] expand description of poly_int conversions

Richard, If you agree, I'd like to update the conversion section of the poly_int manual to make the conversion to make it clearer that the to_constant() function can be used even with class types like offset_int besides scalars. Also, when testing this I also tried converting poly64_int into