On 12/1/23 10:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:04:38AM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Thanks, this looks good to me. I think I also noticed this weird formatting
in passing recently when I was looking for something else and did not have
time to track it down myself.
There
On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 10:04:38AM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> Thanks, this looks good to me. I think I also noticed this weird formatting
> in passing recently when I was looking for something else and did not have
> time to track it down myself.
There is another question. In many cases
On 12/1/23 03:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-_005f_005fbuiltin_005fstdc_005fbit_005ffloor>>
I've noticed that while e.g. __builtin_stdc_bit_floor builtin is properly
rendered in bold and bigger size, for the
On 12/1/23 03:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-_005f_005fbuiltin_005fstdc_005fbit_005ffloor
I've noticed that while e.g. __builtin_stdc_bit_floor builtin is properly
rendered in bold and bigger size, for the
Hi!
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-_005f_005fbuiltin_005fstdc_005fbit_005ffloor
I've noticed that while e.g. __builtin_stdc_bit_floor builtin is properly
rendered in bold and bigger size, for the __builtin_stdc_bit_width builtin
it is not the builtin name which
