On 7/28/23 15:11, Joseph Myers wrote:
This patch is OK.
I fixed the whitespace errors in the patch as well as a couple minor
ChangeLog entry items and pushed Costas's patch to the trunk.
jeff
This patch is OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
ping
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 at 09:05, Costas Argyris
wrote:
> Pinging to try and get this bug in gcc-ar fixed.
>
> Note that the patch posted as an attachment in
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/623400.html
>
> is exactly the same as the patch embedded in
>
>
Pinging to try and get this bug in gcc-ar fixed.
Note that the patch posted as an attachment in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/623400.html
is exactly the same as the patch embedded in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/623855.html
and the one posted in
Bootstrapped successfully on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
On Fri, 7 Jul 2023 at 11:33, Costas Argyris
wrote:
> Problem: gcc-ar fails when a @file is passed to it:
>
> $ cat rsp
> --version
> $ gcc-ar @rsp
> /usr/bin/ar: invalid option -- '@'
>
> This is because a dash '-' is prepended to the first
>
Problem: gcc-ar fails when a @file is passed to it:
$ cat rsp
--version
$ gcc-ar @rsp
/usr/bin/ar: invalid option -- '@'
This is because a dash '-' is prepended to the first
argument if it doesn't start with one, resulting in
the wrong call 'ar -@rsp'.
Fix: Expand argv to get rid of any @files
I should also add that for a rsp file that contains just "--version":
gcc-ar @rsp
fails without the patch (current problem) and successfully prints
the version info with it.
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 at 22:45, Costas Argyris
wrote:
> Basically implementing what Andrew said in the PR:
>
>
Basically implementing what Andrew said in the PR:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77576
If @file has been passed to gcc-ar, do the following:
1) Expand it to get an argv without any @files.
2) Then apply the plugin modifications to argv.
3) Create temporary response file.
4) Put
