>> + _4 = vD.2208;
>> + _5 = .VEC_EXTRACT (_4, idx_2(D));
>> + _3 = _5; */
>
> I think you are doing
>
> _3 = .VEC_EXTRACT (_4, idx_2(D));
>
> and avoiding the SSA name copy correctly. Can you double-check?
>
> OK with the comment adjusted.
Argh, yes, thanks.
Regards
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> changed the patch according to your comments and I agree that
> it is more readable that way. I hope using lhs as target for
> the extract directly is possible the way I did it. Richard's
> patch for aarch64 is already, therefore testsuite
Hi Richard,
changed the patch according to your comments and I agree that
it is more readable that way. I hope using lhs as target for
the extract directly is possible the way I did it. Richard's
patch for aarch64 is already, therefore testsuites on aarch64 and
i386 are unchanged.
Regards
Robi
On Mon, 3 Jul 2023, Robin Dapp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In gimple-isel we already deduce a vec_set pattern from an
> ARRAY_REF(VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR). This patch does the same for a
> vec_extract.
>
> The code is largely similar to the vec_set one including
> the addition of a can_vec_extract_var_idx_p fun
Hi,
In gimple-isel we already deduce a vec_set pattern from an
ARRAY_REF(VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR). This patch does the same for a
vec_extract.
The code is largely similar to the vec_set one including
the addition of a can_vec_extract_var_idx_p function
in optabs.cc to check if the backend can handle a
