Jakub Jelinek writes:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:52:23AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > > But it seems like the magic incantation to detect “real” built-in
>> > > function
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:52:23AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > > > But it seems like the magic incantation to detect “real”
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 11:52:23AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > > But it seems like the magic incantation to detect “real” built-in
> > > function calls is getting longer and
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > But it seems like the magic incantation to detect “real” built-in
> > function calls is getting longer and longer. Can we not abstract this
> > in a single place rather than have to
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:41:44AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> But it seems like the magic incantation to detect “real” built-in
> function calls is getting longer and longer. Can we not abstract this
> in a single place rather than have to repeat the same long sequence in
> multiple
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches writes:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:13:24AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:28:53AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > > > > In GIMPLE,
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:13:24AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:28:53AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > > In GIMPLE, we call:
> > > > > &&
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:13:24AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:28:53AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > In GIMPLE, we call:
> > > > && gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (stmt, fndecl)
> > > > but that is
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:28:53AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > In GIMPLE, we call:
> > > && gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (stmt, fndecl)
> > > but that is insufficient, that verifies whether the arguments passed to
> > > GIMPLE_CALL
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 11:28:53AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > In GIMPLE, we call:
> > && gimple_builtin_call_types_compatible_p (stmt, fndecl)
> > but that is insufficient, that verifies whether the arguments passed to
> > GIMPLE_CALL match the fndecl argument types. But that fndecl may
10 matches
Mail list logo