On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Using unsigned long long int for fmt_size_t and "ll" for GCC_PRISZ
> as broke the gengtype on i686-linux before the libiberty fix is certainly
> unexpected. size_t is there unsigned int, so expected fmt_size_t is
> unsigned int (or some other
Hi!
Using unsigned long long int for fmt_size_t and "ll" for GCC_PRISZ
as broke the gengtype on i686-linux before the libiberty fix is certainly
unexpected. size_t is there unsigned int, so expected fmt_size_t is
unsigned int (or some other 32-bit type).
The problem was that I was comparing
