On 05/12/2023 10:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:57:50AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
On 05/12/2023 10:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:47:34AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
The following patch makes libgfortran build on i686-linux after hacking up
Hi all,
the patch submission looks confusing as the context is a bit unclear
(aarch64 having two integer types?) and the slightly unmotivated 'long'
change (as explained in later emails: used as trick to find all
locations that should be changed and not being part of actually proposed
patch).
Ho
* Richard Earnshaw:
> On 05/12/2023 10:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:47:34AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
The following patch makes libgfortran build on i686-linux after hacking up
--- kinds.h.xx 2023-12-05 00:23:00.133365064 +0100
+++ kinds.h2
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:57:50AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 05/12/2023 10:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:47:34AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > > The following patch makes libgfortran build on i686-linux after hacking
> > > > up
> > > > --- kinds.h.xx 202
On 05/12/2023 10:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:47:34AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
The following patch makes libgfortran build on i686-linux after hacking up
--- kinds.h.xx 2023-12-05 00:23:00.133365064 +0100
+++ kinds.h 2023-12-05 11:19:24.409679808 +0100
@@ -10
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:47:34AM +, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > The following patch makes libgfortran build on i686-linux after hacking up
> > --- kinds.h.xx 2023-12-05 00:23:00.133365064 +0100
> > +++ kinds.h 2023-12-05 11:19:24.409679808 +0100
> > @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ typedef GFC_INTEGER_
On 05/12/2023 10:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
Presumably the fixes will look like this?
diff --git a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
index db3330060ce..4fcc77dbf83 100644
--- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
Hi!
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:46:02AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Presumably the fixes will look like this?
>
> diff --git a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
> index db3330060ce..4fcc77dbf83 100644
> --- a/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
> +++ b/libgfortran/io/list_read.c
>