On 25/11/20 18:39 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/11/20 10:35 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've pushed that as ad9cbcee543ecccd79fa49dafcd925532d2ce210 but there
are still other FAILs to be fixed.
I think the other FAILs are due to a race condition in the tests,
fixed by this patch.
On 25/11/20 10:35 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I've pushed that as ad9cbcee543ecccd79fa49dafcd925532d2ce210 but there
are still other FAILs to be fixed.
I think the other FAILs are due to a race condition in the tests,
fixed by this patch. Tested x86_64-linux, powerpc64le-linux,
On 25/11/20 10:35 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 25/11/20 01:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/20 23:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan
On 25/11/20 01:07 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/20 23:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas
On 24/11/20 23:45 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>In file included from
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 1:31 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 22/11/20 13:37 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
> >On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
> >
> >> thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
> >>
> >> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat,
On 22/11/20 22:13 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
Clang complains:
$ cat test.cc
#include
$ clang++ --gcc-toolchain=~/gcc/trunk/inst -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only test.cc
In file included from test.cc:1:
In file
On 22/11/20 22:41 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
...and there are multiple definition complaints from the linker
because of two missing "include":
index 7b2682a577e..23ab2018ca8 100644
---
On 23/11/20 18:31 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 22/11/20 13:37 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn
On 22/11/20 13:37 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
> wrote:
>> I am seeing 93 new
On 22/11/20 01:27 +, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
wrote:
I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
that it is due to this
On 21/11/20 17:39 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
On 21/11/20 16:36 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>In file included from
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
...and there are multiple definition complaints from the linker because
of two missing "include":
index 7b2682a577e..23ab2018ca8 100644
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/atomic_wait.h
+++
On 20/11/2020 23:44, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
Clang complains:
$ cat test.cc
#include
$ clang++ --gcc-toolchain=~/gcc/trunk/inst -std=c++20 -fsyntax-only test.cc
In file included from test.cc:1:
In file included from
On Sun, 22 Nov 2020, 12:29 Iain Sandoe, wrote:
> thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
>
> Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
> > wrote:
> >> I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
> >>
thanks for looking at this over the weekend.
Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
wrote:
I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 at 23:55, David Edelsohn via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
> fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
> that it is due to this patch, but it's the likely suspect.
Yes, it's that patch.
On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 9:40 AM Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >>In file included from
>
I am seeing 93 new libstdc++ failures on AIX, even after Jonathan's
fixes. And a few c++ failures with similar symptoms. I'm not certain
that it is due to this patch, but it's the likely suspect.
FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2020/all_attributes.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL:
On 21/11/20 17:04 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
On 21/11/20 16:16 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:78,
from
In file included from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/shared_ptr_atomic.h:33,
from
/daten/aranym/gcc/gcc-20201121/Build/m68k-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/memory:78,
from
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed.
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 3:23 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 26/10/20 14:48 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>> +#include
>> +
>> +#if __has_include()
>> +#define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_POSIX_SEMAPHORE 1
>> +#include
>
> It occurs to me now that this check probably
On 03/11/20 22:22 +0100, Christophe Lyon via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 19:43, Thomas Rodgers via Gcc-patches
wrote:
Testsed x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to master.
Hi,
I can see the new tests failing on bare-metal targets using newlib
(arm-eabi, aarch64-elf):
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 19:43, Thomas Rodgers via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
>
> Testsed x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to master.
>
Hi,
I can see the new tests failing on bare-metal targets using newlib
(arm-eabi, aarch64-elf):
27_io/basic_syncbuf/1.cc (test for excess errors)
Testsed x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to master.
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 02/11/20 08:10 -0800, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>>From: Thomas Rodgers
>>
>>IGNORE the previous patch.
>>
>>Changes implementation to use a private __mutex type as discussed on
>>IRC.
>>
>>libstdc++/ChangeLog:
>>
On 02/11/20 08:10 -0800, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
IGNORE the previous patch.
Changes implementation to use a private __mutex type as discussed on
IRC.
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
From: Thomas Rodgers
IGNORE the previous patch.
Changes implementation to use a private __mutex type as discussed on
IRC.
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
From: Thomas Rodgers
Changes implementation to use a private __mutex type as discussed on
IRC.
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
From: Thomas Rodgers
Addresses latest patch feedback. Changes to also work on
single threaded configurations.
libstdc++/ChangeLog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
On 21/10/20 09:53 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
On 26/10/20 14:48 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
+#include
+
+#if __has_include()
+#define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_POSIX_SEMAPHORE 1
+#include
It occurs to me now that this check probably isn't robust enough. For
any POSIX system it's probably safe to assume that means
the POSIX header and so sem_t is
From: Thomas Rodgers
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary_semaphore
* latch
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am (bits_headers): Add new header.
* include/Makefile.in:
> On Oct 21, 2020, at 10:34 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On 21/10/20 09:53 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>> From: Thomas Rodgers
>>
>> libstdc++/Changelog:
>> libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
>> libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new
On 21/10/20 09:53 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
From: Thomas Rodgers
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h: Include
From: Thomas Rodgers
This should address the cumulative comments (modulo the discussion going
on on the reflector about specification issues/questions).
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/doc/doxygen/user.cfg.in (INPUT): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am
On 15/10/20 07:46 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
+ template ,
+ typename _Alloc = allocator<_CharT>>
+class basic_osyncstream : public basic_ostream<_CharT, _Traits>
+{
+public:
+ // Types:
+ using char_type = _CharT;
+ using traits_type = _Traits;
+
On 15/10/20 07:46 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
* Note: depends on a sufficiently C++20ified basic_stringbuf<>.
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
On 15/10/20 07:46 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
* Note: depends on a sufficiently C++20ified basic_stringbuf<>.
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
From: Thomas Rodgers
* Note: depends on a sufficiently C++20ified basic_stringbuf<>.
libstdc++/Changelog:
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.am (std_headers): Add new header.
libstdc++-v3/include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
libstdc++-v3/include/std/streambuf
From: Thomas Rodgers
Updated patch incorporating latest feedback (revised).
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary_semaphore
* latch
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am
From: Thomas Rodgers
Updated patch incorporating latest feedback.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
* binary_semaphore
* latch
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/Makefile.am (bits_headers):
On 28/09/20 14:29 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
+template
+ __atomic_wait_status
+ __platform_wait_until_impl(__platform_wait_t* __addr,
+__platform_wait_t __val,
+const
chrono::time_point<__platform_wait_clock_t,
+
Jonathan Wakely writes:
> On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
>>From: Thomas Rodgers
>>
>>This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
>>being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
>>
>>Add support for -
>> *
On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
*
On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
*
On 11/09/20 16:58 -0700, Thomas Rodgers wrote:
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
*
From: Thomas Rodgers
This patch supercedes both the Add C++2a synchronization support patch
being replied to *and* the patch adding wait/notify_* to atomic_flag.
Add support for -
* atomic_flag::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* atomic::wait/notify_one/notify_all
* counting_semaphore
*
51 matches
Mail list logo
