On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 at 20:30, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Clang (with -std=c++17/20) now complains about
>
> > include/c++/11.0.0/variant:1032:10: error: no matching constructor for
> > initialization of 'std::__nonesuch'
> > return __nonesuch{};
> >^
On 08/10/2020 16:27, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches wrote:
On 05/10/20 22:35 +0300, Ville Voutilainen via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 01:15, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
The patch is borked, doesn't pass tests, fixing...
Unborked, ok for trunk if full testsuite passes?
Assuming it
On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 13:52, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> index_sequence uses size_t not unsigned long. This parameter pack
> needs to be size_t... _Idxs, and the NTTP for __check_visitor_result
> should be size_t _Idx.
Fixed in
On 05/10/20 22:35 +0300, Ville Voutilainen via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 01:15, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
The patch is borked, doesn't pass tests, fixing...
Unborked, ok for trunk if full testsuite passes?
2020-10-05 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/95904
*
On 05/10/20 22:35 +0300, Ville Voutilainen via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 01:15, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
The patch is borked, doesn't pass tests, fixing...
Unborked, ok for trunk if full testsuite passes?
Assuming it has passed by now, OK. Thanks.
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 at 01:15, Ville Voutilainen
wrote:
> The patch is borked, doesn't pass tests, fixing...
Unborked, ok for trunk if full testsuite passes?
2020-10-05 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/95904
* include/std/variant (__deduce_visit_result): Add a nested ::type.
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 01:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> OK for trunk with those leading spaces switched to tab.
The patch is borked, doesn't pass tests, fixing...
On 29/09/20 19:35 +0300, Ville Voutilainen via Libstdc++ wrote:
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 14:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
I think this is what we want:
template
constexpr inline __same_types = (is_same_v<_Tp, _Types> && ...);
is_same_v is very cheap, it uses the built-in directly, so you
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 14:20, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I think this is what we want:
>
>template
> constexpr inline __same_types = (is_same_v<_Tp, _Types> && ...);
>
> is_same_v is very cheap, it uses the built-in directly, so you don't
> need to instantiate any class templates at all.
>
