form is rejected it seems.
Does the following look OK to commit?
OK, thanks.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix arithmetic bug in
chrono::year_month::operator+
This fixes the months-based addition for year_month when the
year_month's month component is zero.
libstdc++-v3/Chang
ike it.
>
> Would either int(unsigned(__my)) or static_cast(__ym) make sense
> instead, do avoid people wondering about it in future?
The first form works for me. The second form is rejected it seems.
Does the following look OK to commit?
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] libstdc++: Fix
On 27/08/20 11:29 -0400, Patrick Palka via Libstdc++ wrote:
This fixes the months-based addition for year_month when the
year_month's month component is zero.
Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, on the 'date' library's
calendar and (now) on libcxx's calendar tests. Does this look OK to
This fixes the months-based addition for year_month when the
year_month's month component is zero.
Successfully tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, on the 'date' library's
calendar and (now) on libcxx's calendar tests. Does this look OK to
commit?
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/chrono
