On 02/02/24 12:14 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This should fix the problem that libstdc++exp.a doesn't actually contain
the symbols from libstdc++fs.a, despite me claiming it did.
This increases the size of libstdc++exp.a considerably, because now it
really does contain what I intended it to
This should fix the problem that libstdc++exp.a doesn't actually contain
the symbols from libstdc++fs.a, despite me claiming it did.
This increases the size of libstdc++exp.a considerably, because now it
really does contain what I intended it to contain. We might be able to
avoid that increased
