On Tue, 16 Jan 2024, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 14:39, Patrick Palka wrote:
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
>
> Oh! I thought this went in as part of the original cartesian_product
> commit. I would have asked you to do it at the same
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 at 14:39, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
Oh! I thought this went in as part of the original cartesian_product
commit. I would have asked you to do it at the same time otherwise,
sorry.
Yes, OK for trunk and gcc-13,
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk/13?
-- >8 --
This paper changes the identity element of views::cartesian_product to
be a single empty tuple instead of an empty range.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/std/ranges (views::_CartesianProduct::operator()):
