On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 22:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> Does anybody see any problem with making this change, so that we avoid
> the problem described in the PR?
Pushed to trunk. We should backport this too.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> As described in PR libstdc++/113258 there are old versions of tcmalloc
Does anybody see any problem with making this change, so that we avoid
the problem described in the PR?
-- >8 --
As described in PR libstdc++/113258 there are old versions of tcmalloc
which replace malloc and related APIs, but do not repalce aligned_alloc
because it didn't exist at the time they
