Re: [PATCH] lower-bitint: Fix up handle_operand_addr INTEGER_CST handling [PR113361]

On Sat, 13 Jan 2024, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > As the testcase shows, the INTEGER_CST handling in handle_operand_addr > (i.e. what is used when passing address of an integer to a bitint library > routine) wasn't correct. If the minimum precision to represent an > INTEGER_CST is smaller or

Re: [PATCH] lower-bitint: Fix up handle_operand_addr INTEGER_CST handling [PR113361]

> Am 13.01.2024 um 10:44 schrieb Jakub Jelinek : > > Hi! > > As the testcase shows, the INTEGER_CST handling in handle_operand_addr > (i.e. what is used when passing address of an integer to a bitint library > routine) wasn't correct. If the minimum precision to represent an > INTEGER_CST

[PATCH] lower-bitint: Fix up handle_operand_addr INTEGER_CST handling [PR113361]

Hi! As the testcase shows, the INTEGER_CST handling in handle_operand_addr (i.e. what is used when passing address of an integer to a bitint library routine) wasn't correct. If the minimum precision to represent an INTEGER_CST is smaller or equal to limb_prec, the code correctly uses