Re: [PATCH] missing reuire target has_arch_ppc64 for pr106550.c

Hi, >>> --- >>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550.c >>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550.c >>> index 74e395331ab..146514b3adf 100644 >>> ---

Re: [PATCH] missing reuire target has_arch_ppc64 for pr106550.c

Hi, "Kewen.Lin" writes: > Hi Jeff, > > subject typo: s/reuire/require/ Thanks! > > on 2024/5/23 09:11, Jiufu Guo wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Case pr106550.c is testing constant building for 64bit >> register. So, this case requires target of has_arch_ppc64. >> > > Nit: Maybe add more comments saying

Re: [PATCH] missing reuire target has_arch_ppc64 for pr106550.c

Hi Jeff, subject typo: s/reuire/require/ on 2024/5/23 09:11, Jiufu Guo wrote: > Hi, > > Case pr106550.c is testing constant building for 64bit > register. So, this case requires target of has_arch_ppc64. > Nit: Maybe add more comments saying it fails with -m32 without having the expected

[PATCH] missing reuire target has_arch_ppc64 for pr106550.c

Hi, Case pr106550.c is testing constant building for 64bit register. So, this case requires target of has_arch_ppc64. Bootstrap and regtest pass on ppc64{,le}. Is this ok for trunk? BR, Jeff(Jiufu) Guo --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr106550.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff