On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Applied, thanks. Sorry for the delay.
It caused PR61066 on the branch.
Richard.
Jason
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Applied, thanks. Sorry for the delay.
It caused PR61066 on the branch.
Richard.
Jason
It seems some tests didn't run when I tested the
Sorry, ping for maintainer.
We'd do need this for 4.8.3.
Thanks,
Daniel.
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Daniel Gutson
daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
Ping for maintainer please.
Thanks,
Daniel.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Daniel Gutson
Applied, thanks. Sorry for the delay.
Jason
Ping for maintainer please.
Thanks,
Daniel.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Daniel Gutson
daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
cc:ing Jason, who's the C++ maintainer.
FWIW: I created
cc:ing Jason, who's the C++ maintainer.
Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com writes:
ping for maintainer.
Could this be considered for 4.8.3 please?
Thanks,
Daniel.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Daniel Gutson
daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
I just
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
cc:ing Jason, who's the C++ maintainer.
FWIW: I created http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com writes:
ping for maintainer.
Could this be
ping for maintainer.
Could this be considered for 4.8.3 please?
Thanks,
Daniel.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Daniel Gutson
daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
I just realized I posted the patch in the wrong list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Gutson
I just realized I posted the patch in the wrong list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Gutson daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com
Date: Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:43 AM
Subject: [PATCH] pedantic warning behavior when casting void* to
ptr-to-func, 4.8 and 4.9
To: gcc Mailing List