Re: [PATCH] renable lto on darwin9

2011-03-16 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 16, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > The assembler bug in Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 only impacts darwin10, so lto can > be renabled for darwin9 > Okay for gcc trunk and 4.6.0? Ok. I've now applied the patch to trunk and 4.6.x, thanks.

Re: [PATCH] renable lto on darwin9

2011-03-16 Thread Jack Howarth
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 03:50:20PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > The assembler bug in Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 only impacts darwin10, so lto can > > be renabled for darwin9 (for which it has been well tested on the regress > > server). Re-enabling lto for

Re: [PATCH] renable lto on darwin9

2011-03-16 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Jack Howarth wrote: > The assembler bug in Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 only impacts darwin10, so lto can > be renabled for darwin9 (for which it has been well tested on the regress > server). Re-enabling lto for *-apple-darwin9 on darwin allows us to > continue to monitor the status of

[PATCH] renable lto on darwin9

2011-03-16 Thread Jack Howarth
The assembler bug in Xcode 3.2.6/4.0 only impacts darwin10, so lto can be renabled for darwin9 (for which it has been well tested on the regress server). Re-enabling lto for *-apple-darwin9 on darwin allows us to continue to monitor the status of darwin lto support while the containerized lto cha