On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 1:38 AM Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As PR111367 shows, with prefixed insn supported, some of
> checkings consider it's able to leverage prefixed insn
> for stack protect related load/store, but since we don't
> actually change the emitted assembly for 32 bit, it can
>
Hi,
As PR111367 shows, with prefixed insn supported, some of
checkings consider it's able to leverage prefixed insn
for stack protect related load/store, but since we don't
actually change the emitted assembly for 32 bit, it can
cause the assembler error as exposed.
Mike's commit
