On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 5:37 PM Surya Kumari Jangala
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 21/09/22 1:03 pm, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 9:18 AM Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jeff, Richard,
> >> Thank you for reviewing the patch!
> >> I have committed
Hi Richard,
On 21/09/22 1:03 pm, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 9:18 AM Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jeff, Richard,
>> Thank you for reviewing the patch!
>> I have committed the patch to the gcc repo.
>> Can I backport this patch to prior versions of
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 9:18 AM Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff, Richard,
> Thank you for reviewing the patch!
> I have committed the patch to the gcc repo.
> Can I backport this patch to prior versions of gcc, as this is an easy patch
> to backport and the issue exists
Hi Jeff, Richard,
Thank you for reviewing the patch!
I have committed the patch to the gcc repo.
Can I backport this patch to prior versions of gcc, as this is an easy patch to
backport and the issue exists in prior versions too?
Regards,
Surya
On 31/08/22 9:09 pm, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
On 8/23/2022 5:49 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc-patches wrote:
sched1: Fix -fcompare-debug issue in schedule_region [PR105586]
In schedule_region(), a basic block that does not contain any real insns
is not scheduled and the dfa state at the entry of the bb is not copied
to the fallthru
Surya Kumari Jangala via Gcc-patches writes:
> sched1: Fix -fcompare-debug issue in schedule_region [PR105586]
>
> In schedule_region(), a basic block that does not contain any real insns
> is not scheduled and the dfa state at the entry of the bb is not copied
> to the fallthru basic block.
Hi Peter, Segher,
Thanks for going thru the patch!
I will make the proposed changes to the Changelog.
Regards,
Surya
On 23/08/22 6:58 pm, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 07:55:22AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> It looks good to me, but I cannot approve it.
>
>
Hi!
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 07:55:22AM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote:
> It looks good to me, but I cannot approve it.
Same here (both statements).
> That said, you're missing
> a ChangeLog entry for your new helper function. The ChangeLog mentions
> what changed, not why it changed.
And that is
On 8/23/22 6:49 AM, Surya Kumari Jangala wrote:
> sched1: Fix -fcompare-debug issue in schedule_region [PR105586]
>
> In schedule_region(), a basic block that does not contain any real insns
> is not scheduled and the dfa state at the entry of the bb is not copied
> to the fallthru basic block.
sched1: Fix -fcompare-debug issue in schedule_region [PR105586]
In schedule_region(), a basic block that does not contain any real insns
is not scheduled and the dfa state at the entry of the bb is not copied
to the fallthru basic block. However a DEBUG insn is treated as a real
insn, and if a bb
10 matches
Mail list logo
