Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-11-23 Thread Christophe Lyon
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:09, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Hi Christophe. > > > On 23 Nov 2023, at 09:02, Christophe Lyon > > wrote: > > > > Hi Iain, > > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:58, Richard Sandiford > > wrote: > >> > >> Iain Sandoe writes: > >>> Hi Richard, > >>> > On 5 Nov 2023, at 12:11

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-11-23 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Christophe. > On 23 Nov 2023, at 09:02, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > Hi Iain, > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:58, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >> >> Iain Sandoe writes: >>> Hi Richard, >>> On 5 Nov 2023, at 12:11, Richard Sandiford wrote: Iain Sandoe writes: >>> >>

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-11-23 Thread Christophe Lyon
Hi Iain, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:58, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Iain Sandoe writes: > > Hi Richard, > > > >> On 5 Nov 2023, at 12:11, Richard Sandiford > >> wrote: > >> > >> Iain Sandoe writes: > > > On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote: > >>> > > On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49,

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-11-06 Thread Richard Sandiford
Iain Sandoe writes: > Hi Richard, > >> On 5 Nov 2023, at 12:11, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> >> Iain Sandoe writes: > On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote: >>> > On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49, Richard Sandiford >>> wrote: > > Iain Sandoe writes: >> This was written be

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-11-05 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Richard, > On 5 Nov 2023, at 12:11, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Iain Sandoe writes: >>> On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49, Richard Sandiford >> wrote: Iain Sandoe writes: > This was written before Thomas' modification to the EL

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-11-05 Thread Richard Sandiford
Iain Sandoe writes: > Hi Richard, > >> On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote: > >>> On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49, Richard Sandiford > wrote: >>> >>> Iain Sandoe writes: This was written before Thomas' modification to the ELF-handling to allow a config-based change for target details

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-10-27 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 4:00 AM Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Hi Richard, > > > On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > >> On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49, Richard Sandiford > >> wrote: > >> > >> Iain Sandoe writes: > >>> This was written before Thomas' modification to the ELF-handling to allow > >

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-10-27 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Richard, > On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote: >> On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49, Richard Sandiford >> wrote: >> >> Iain Sandoe writes: >>> This was written before Thomas' modification to the ELF-handling to allow >>> a config-based change for target details. I did consider updating t

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-10-26 Thread Iain Sandoe
Hi Richard, > On 26 Oct 2023, at 20:49, Richard Sandiford wrote: > > Iain Sandoe writes: >> This was written before Thomas' modification to the ELF-handling to allow >> a config-based change for target details. I did consider updating this >> to try and use that scheme, but I think that it wou

Re: [PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-10-26 Thread Richard Sandiford
Iain Sandoe writes: > This was written before Thomas' modification to the ELF-handling to allow > a config-based change for target details. I did consider updating this > to try and use that scheme, but I think that it would sit a little > awkwardly, since there are some differences in the start-

[PATCH] testsuite, Darwin: Add support for Mach-O function body scans.

2023-10-26 Thread Iain Sandoe
This was written before Thomas' modification to the ELF-handling to allow a config-based change for target details. I did consider updating this to try and use that scheme, but I think that it would sit a little awkwardly, since there are some differences in the start-up scanning for Mach-O. I wo