> -Original Message-
> From: Gcc-patches On Behalf Of
> Christophe Lyon via Gcc-patches
> Sent: 21 April 2021 21:48
> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: [PATCH] testsuite/arm: Fix and rename arm_qbit_ok into
> arm_sat_ok effective-target
>
> The acle/s
ping?
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 at 16:22, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 22:48, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > The acle/saturation.c test uses __[su]sat() and
> > __saturation_occurred() intrinsics but __[su]sat() are defined in
> > acle.h if __ARM_FEATURE_SAT true,
ping?
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 at 22:48, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> The acle/saturation.c test uses __[su]sat() and
> __saturation_occurred() intrinsics but __[su]sat() are defined in
> acle.h if __ARM_FEATURE_SAT true, while __saturation_occurred()
> depends on __ARM_FEATURE_QBIT.
>
> QBIT is a v5te
The acle/saturation.c test uses __[su]sat() and
__saturation_occurred() intrinsics but __[su]sat() are defined in
acle.h if __ARM_FEATURE_SAT true, while __saturation_occurred()
depends on __ARM_FEATURE_QBIT.
QBIT is a v5te feature, while SAT is available since v6, so the test
really needs
