Re: [PATCH] testsuite/vect: Make check more accurate.

2023-11-09 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2023-11-07T09:22:16+0100, Robin Dapp wrote: > similar to before this modifies a check so we do only match a > vectorization attempt if it succeeded. On riscv we potentially try > several modes of which some may fail. > > I tested on riscv, aarch64 and x86 but on the cfarm machines >

Re: [PATCH] testsuite/vect: Make check more accurate.

2023-11-07 Thread Robin Dapp
Sorry, didn't reply-all: > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing condition reduction with > FOLD_EXTRACT_LAST" 4 "vect" { target { { vect_fold_extract_last } && { ! > vect_pack_trunc } } } } } */ > > This check should be removed. Previously, I added it since we didn't enable  >

[PATCH] testsuite/vect: Make check more accurate.

2023-11-07 Thread juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
Hi, Robin. /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimizing condition reduction with FOLD_EXTRACT_LAST" 4 "vect" { target { { vect_fold_extract_last } && { ! vect_pack_trunc } } } } } */ This check should be removed. Previously, I added it since we didn't enable vect_pack_trunc test. But I

Re: [PATCH] testsuite/vect: Make check more accurate.

2023-11-07 Thread Richard Biener
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 9:22 AM Robin Dapp wrote: > > Hi, > > similar to before this modifies a check so we do only match a > vectorization attempt if it succeeded. On riscv we potentially try > several modes of which some may fail. OK. > I tested on riscv, aarch64 and x86 but on the cfarm

[PATCH] testsuite/vect: Make check more accurate.

2023-11-07 Thread Robin Dapp
Hi, similar to before this modifies a check so we do only match a vectorization attempt if it succeeded. On riscv we potentially try several modes of which some may fail. I tested on riscv, aarch64 and x86 but on the cfarm machines there is no vect_fold_extract_last. Maybe gcn would work?