On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 09:59:12PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:06:57PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:52:17PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > > The issue in PR112344 is triggered only at -O2, so there is little value
> > > in running
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:06:57PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:52:17PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > The issue in PR112344 is triggered only at -O2, so there is little value
> > in running the test at lower optimization levels. At the same time the
>
> That is
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 07:52:17PM +0200, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> The issue in PR112344 is triggered only at -O2, so there is little value
> in running the test at lower optimization levels. At the same time the
That is generally not true.
We had hundreds of cases in the history where a test
The issue in PR112344 is triggered only at -O2, so there is little value
in running the test at lower optimization levels. At the same time the
generated code at low and code-size optimization levels is taking a long
time to execute because it loops a few billion iterations.
On the PRU simulator
