Thanks, now I have totally understand! I think it deserves a clearer
prompt, but I do not have a better idea currently. So forget it, thanks!
在 2023年12月11日星期一，Richard Biener 写道：
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:39 PM xndcn wrote:
> >
> > Got it, thanks! It is really confusing >,<
> > What about
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 12:39 PM xndcn wrote:
>
> Got it, thanks! It is really confusing >,<
> What about the first one? For case MEM_REF.
The same - the LHS determines this is a store, if it is the
RHS is invalid as diagnosed (it needs to go through a
temporary).
Richard.
> 在
Got it, thanks! It is really confusing >,<
What about the first one? For case MEM_REF.
在 2023年12月11日星期一，Richard Biener 写道：
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 4:00 PM xndcn wrote:
> >
> > Hi, I am a newbie in GCC, and I do not have access to git repo.
> >
> > I found some misleading error messages in
On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 4:00 PM xndcn wrote:
>
> Hi, I am a newbie in GCC, and I do not have access to git repo.
>
> I found some misleading error messages in verify_gimple_assign_single
> function of tree-cfg.cc. It prompt error "invalid RHS for gimple memory
> store: ", but it checks lhs in
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-cfg.cc (verify_gimple_assign_single): Fix misleading error, from
"invalid LHS ..." to "invalid RHS ..."
Signed-off-by: xndcn
---
gcc/tree-cfg.cc | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.cc b/gcc/tree-cfg.cc
index
Sorry about the attachment, re-paste here
fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: xndcn
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 22:38:16 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] tree-cfg: Fix misleading error message in
verify_gimple_assign_single.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* tree-cfg.cc (verify_gimple_assign_single): Fix misleading error, from "invalid LHS ..." to "inv
