On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 12:27:13PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:22:56AM -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > On 2023-01-25 02:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > > t = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
> > > > - off = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR,
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:22:56AM -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 2023-01-25 02:44, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > t = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
> > > - off = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (t),
> > > + off = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR,
> > > +
On 2023-01-25 02:44, Richard Biener wrote:
t = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
- off = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR, DECL_FIELD_OFFSET (t),
+ off = size_binop (PLUS_EXPR,
+ (TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2) ? TREE_OPERAND (expr, 2)
+: DECL_FIELD_OFFSET
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:44:31AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > --- a/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> > +++ b/gcc/tree-object-size.cc
> > @@ -412,7 +412,9 @@ compute_object_offset (const_tree expr, const_tree var)
> > return base;
> >
> >t = TREE_OPERAND (expr, 1);
> > - off =
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:54 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
>
> Use the offset in TREE_OPERAND(component_ref, 2) when available instead
> of DECL_FIELD_OFFSET when trying to compute offset for a COMPONENT_REF.
>
> OK for gcc 13 and gcc 12?
>
> Co-authored-by: Jakub Jelinek
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 04:54:00PM -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Use the offset in TREE_OPERAND(component_ref, 2) when available instead
> of DECL_FIELD_OFFSET when trying to compute offset for a COMPONENT_REF.
>
> OK for gcc 13 and gcc 12?
Ok for trunk, I'd wait a week or two with the
Use the offset in TREE_OPERAND(component_ref, 2) when available instead
of DECL_FIELD_OFFSET when trying to compute offset for a COMPONENT_REF.
OK for gcc 13 and gcc 12?
Co-authored-by: Jakub Jelinek
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/108522
* tree-object-size.cc
