> Am 20.06.2023 um 18:46 schrieb Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
> :
>
> Hi!
>
> In the following testcase we fail to pattern recognize the least significant
> .UADDC call. The reason is that arg3 in that case is
> _3 = .ADD_OVERFLOW (...);
> _2 = __imag__ _3;
> _1 = _2 != 0;
> arg3 =
Hi!
In the following testcase we fail to pattern recognize the least significant
.UADDC call. The reason is that arg3 in that case is
_3 = .ADD_OVERFLOW (...);
_2 = __imag__ _3;
_1 = _2 != 0;
arg3 = (unsigned long) _1;
and while before the changes arg3 has a single use in some
