On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:49:25AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On trees we'd use tree_[sign_]nop_conversion () instead of
> > useless_type_conversion_p, I think it's OK to allow all such
> > pointer conversions. In the end this probably means being
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 09:49:25AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On trees we'd use tree_[sign_]nop_conversion () instead of
> useless_type_conversion_p, I think it's OK to allow all such
> pointer conversions. In the end this probably means being
> more forgiving than TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT
