Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-10-23 Thread Tom de Vries
On 10/22/20 3:19 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:45:31PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >> I've updated the patch accordingly. >> >> FWIW, I now run into an ICE which looks like PR96680: > > With the patch I've posted today to fix up declare variant LTO handling, > Tobias

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-10-22 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 05:45:31PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > I've updated the patch accordingly. > > FWIW, I now run into an ICE which looks like PR96680: With the patch I've posted today to fix up declare variant LTO handling, Tobias reported the patch still doesn't work, and there are two

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-10-06 Thread Tom de Vries
On 10/6/20 5:02 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 04:48:40PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: >> On 10/5/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: >>> On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: > * {target-32.c,

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-10-06 Thread Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 04:48:40PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 10/5/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > > On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: > >>> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}: > >>> no "usleep" implemented for

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-10-06 Thread Tom de Vries
On 10/5/20 3:15 PM, Tom de Vries wrote: > On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: >>> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}: >>> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690 >> >> Please don't, I want to deal

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-10-05 Thread Tom de Vries
On 2/7/20 4:29 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: >> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}: >> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690 > > Please don't, I want to deal with that using declare variant, just didn't >

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-02-10 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 08:49:47AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: > Add xfails for nvptx offloading because > "no GOMP_OFFLOAD_async_run implemented in plugin-nvptx.c" > (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81688) and because > "omp target link not implemented for nvptx" > (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81689). > >

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-02-09 Thread Harwath, Frederik
Hi Jakub, On 07.02.20 16:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: >> * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}: >> no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690 > > Please don't, I want to deal with that using declare variant,

Re: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-02-07 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:56:38AM +0100, Harwath, Frederik wrote: > * {target-32.c, thread-limit-2.c}: > no "usleep" implemented for nvptx. Cf. https://gcc.gnu.org/PR81690 Please don't, I want to deal with that using declare variant, just didn't get yet around to finishing the last patch needed

[PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests

2020-02-07 Thread Harwath, Frederik
k From 6e5e2d45f02235a0f72e6130dcd8d52f88f7b126 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederik Harwath Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 08:03:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] xfail and improve some failing libgomp tests * libgomp.c/{target-32.c,thread-limit-2.c} Regarding failures because "no usleep implemented